Awareness to Action: Firearm Injury Prevention and Policy Recommendations
Table of Contents
Author(s)
Katarina Reyes
Research Manager, Center for Health and BiosciencesLauren Light
Rice University UndergraduateJoshua Hales
Medical Student at McGovern Medical School at UTHealth HoustonSandra McKay
Huffington Fellow in Child Health PolicyShare this Publication
- Print This Publication
- Cite This Publication Copy Citation
Katarina Reyes, Lauren Light, Joshua Hales, Sandra McKay, “Awareness to Action: Firearm Injury Prevention and Policy Recommendations” (Houston: Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, August 16, 2024), https://doi.org/10.25613/HRT5-0E29.
Overview
Guns are the leading cause of death among children and adolescents in the United States. As firearm injuries continue to claim lives, it is vital to explore effective strategies to reduce these tragic incidents.
On June 7, 2024, “Preventing Firearm Injury Through Purpose and Policy 2024” — hosted by the Baker Institute Center for Health and Biosciences — brought together leaders with backgrounds in community advocacy, health care, policy, and research to promote awareness, create collaborations, and develop actionable recommendations to curb this epidemic.
Through presentations and panel discussions, participants discussed secure storage, community violence prevention, advocacy, education, and intervention programs — all while addressing the multifaceted challenge of firearm injuries and identifying crucial next steps to enhance prevention efforts.
Key Insights
- Advocating for Policy: Overcoming barriers to passing prevention policies requires incremental approaches, with persistent effort being key. Promoting gun violence prevention is most effective when evidence-based solutions are combined with strategic coalition building. This approach helps bridge political divides, increase public awareness, and educate communities on gun safety.
- Addressing Community Violence: Effective gun violence intervention programs depend on involving the community directly to discuss their needs. Partnerships with community organizations address root causes of firearm violence by providing support to victims and encouraging behavioral changes among potential perpetrators within communities.
- Promoting Secure Storage: Improperly stored firearms contribute to firearm theft and unintended injury. Secure storage can be promoted by establishing educational campaigns, raising awareness via social outreach programs, normalizing conversations about secure storage, and increasing access to secure devices.
- Personalizing Firearm Injury Prevention: When considering various strategies to reduce firearm casualties — whether through public health initiatives, medical education, legislation, or technological advances — it is important to remember that behind every statistic is a person with a unique story.
- Empowering Youth Voices in Firearm Legislation Advocacy: By giving youth a voice in this critical conversation, they become empowered to advocate for safer communities and engage in meaningful dialogue on the issue. Their perspectives and energy can drive innovative solutions and inspire broader societal change.
Next Steps and Policy Recommendations
These policy recommendations emerged from the conversations:
- Establish uniform standards and guidelines through federal level legislation to create a cohesive framework that minimizes discrepancies and promotes fairness at the state level.
- Facilitate collaboration between groups involved in gun violence prevention to strengthen advocacy for increased gun regulation.
- Expand funding accessibility for community-based organizations to encourage initiatives tailored to their needs.
- Prioritize community input when conducting research or developing support services like hospital-based violence intervention programs.
Increase partnerships with trusted intermediaries within the firearm-owning community.
This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.